Q&A: obama’s man for the job?

20 July 2010

Question by badbob85037: obama’s man for the job?
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said that when one is in need of health care, one should not depend on folks who advocate a “culture of death.” Last week she said “at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.”

Ginsburg’s candid assessment of the Left’s advocacy for abortion as a means for controlling propagation of undesirable ethnic groups is based upon the writings of atheist social activist and leftist icon Margaret Sanger. Some 50 years before Roe v. Wade, Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which later became Planned Parenthood.

Sanger asserted that ministry to the poor, a fundamental tenet of Christianity, is responsible for excessive numbers of “unwanted” ethnic breeds. “Those vast, complex, interrelated organizations aiming to control and to diminish the spread of misery and destitution and all the menacing evils that spring out of this sinisterly fertile soil, are the surest sign that our civilization has bred, is breeding, and is perpetuating constantly increasing numbers of defectives, delinquents, and dependents. My criticism, therefore, is not directed at the failure of philanthropy, but rather at its success. These dangers are inherent in the very idea of humanitarianism and altruism, dangers which have today produced their full harvest of human waste.”

Sanger characterized the poor as “human weeds, reckless breeders, spawning … human beings who never should have been born.”
She advocated policies that ensured “more children from the fit, less from the unfit” in order to “to create a race of thoroughbreds.” one of the adherents of eugenics, John Holdren now directs obama’s White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and is the co-chair of obama’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology.

Holdren’s modern day eugenics program is outlined in a book he co-authored, “Ecoscience,” in which he calls for “a comprehensive Planetary Regime in order to control the development, administration, conservation and distribution of all natural resources.”
As for global solutions, Holdren writes, “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits. If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. One solution, writes Holdren, is “adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods” which would help weed out those “who contribute to social deterioration.”

With Holdren’s views about population control, why has obama apoint him to a position to determining who receives what medical

Best answer:

Answer by Guru
The German Nazi party was filled with people who advocated reducing
the population by withholding medical treatment for the aged

I see this view is being taken up by some of the current administration

Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!

 Mail this post

Tags:

4 User Comments : Share your thoughts

  1. JusSoliSanguinus=nat'lborn July 20, 2010 at 1:02 pm

    and look at this
    the Obamacrapcare bill contains a requirement for seniors on social security to take a “how to commit suicide” course every five years

    section 1233, pages 425-426.
    http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2295165/posts
    Mandatory End of Life Counseling for Seniors

  2. All i can say is wow! eek!!!

  3. Your question is incomplete. I wish I could see the rest of it.

    Nevertheless, Obama has adopted the liberal Democratic platform unthinkingly and without the slightest consideration for its provenance or objectives. While I disagree with your assessment that Sanger was a leftist, I do think you’re on the mark about population ethicists. They are control freaks. Sanger is a neo-Malthusian, not a leftist. Malthus was a conservative who waged a campaign against the Poor Laws in England, suggesting that giving to the poor actually increased their numbers and thus their misery. Malthus stopped at “natural” checks to population, while Sanger merely takes the next logical step or two.

    Both of these positions are actually very conservative and anti-working-class. They treat the workers like fodder that they can breed at will, or stop from breeding at will. This is the ultimate elitism. Please don’t associate it with anything that belongs on the left. It doesn’t.

    As a Marxist, I condemn population ethics. It’s pure garbage.

  4. - because apparently, Obama actually works for the same ‘Illuminati/Builderburg/’New World Order’ global elitists that Bill Clinton and both Bush’s “Presided” for.
    ‘Google’ search for statements Henry Kissinger made about the “ideal (and GREATLY REDUCED) population for the globe” that he made decades ago – after becoming a ‘Builderberg’ meeting attendee.
    - Look into Alex Jones (www.jonesreport.com) and what he reveals about the rather diabolical intentions of the world’s handful and phenominally wealthy elite for ‘plain ‘ol’ me and you!!! See http://www.conspiracyworld.com (Texx Marrs).
    - If you want to get a serious “program” implemented (like “eugenics” – you “gotta get the right man for the job”!!!
    - Oh, YOU don’t like it??!! -Well, “REX84/’FEMA Camp” anyone??? (Recently built by the Haliburton Corp., from what I’ve heard.)

Leave a Reply

Powered by Yahoo! Answers